OntologyProperty:MuseumType: Difference between revisions
From DBpedia Mappings
Jump to navigationJump to search
GerardKuys (talk | contribs) m (Changed labels as well) |
m (Automatic import of triple <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/museumType> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subPropertyOf> <http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl#isClassifiedBy>) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ObjectProperty | {{ObjectProperty | ||
| labels | | labels = | ||
{{label|en|museumType}} | {{label|en|museumType}} | ||
{{label|nl|soort museum}} | {{label|nl|soort museum}} | ||
| comments | | comments = | ||
{{comment|en|This property has been added because 'buildingType' is much more about the place, whereas 'museumType' is about the way the place is being (or:was) used}} | {{comment|en|This property has been added because 'buildingType' is much more about the place, whereas 'museumType' is about the way the place is being (or:was) used}} | ||
{{comment|nl|Nieuw type is nodig omdat Museum eigenlijk geen subklasse van Building is, maar meer te maken heeft met de functie van het gebouw. 'Museumtype' is dan ook meer thema- en collectiegerelateerd }} | {{comment|nl|Nieuw type is nodig omdat Museum eigenlijk geen subklasse van Building is, maar meer te maken heeft met de functie van het gebouw. 'Museumtype' is dan ook meer thema- en collectiegerelateerd }} | ||
| rdfs:domain | | rdfs:domain = Museum | ||
| rdfs:range | | rdfs:range = owl:Thing | ||
| rdf:type | | rdf:type = | rdfs:subPropertyOf = Type | ||
| rdfs:subPropertyOf = Type | |||
| owl:equivalentProperty = | | owl:equivalentProperty = | ||
| rdfs:subPropertyOf = dul:isClassifiedBy | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:04, 8 July 2014
This is the definition of an ontology property.
Read more about editing the ontology schema.
You can see the result of your edit on DBpedia Live (this is BETA!).
| Ontology object property (help) | |
|---|---|
| rdfs:label (en) | museumType |
| rdfs:label (nl) | soort museum |
| rdfs:comment (en) | This property has been added because 'buildingType' is much more about the place, whereas 'museumType' is about the way the place is being (or:was) used |
| rdfs:comment (nl) | Nieuw type is nodig omdat Museum eigenlijk geen subklasse van Building is, maar meer te maken heeft met de functie van het gebouw. 'Museumtype' is dan ook meer thema- en collectiegerelateerd |
| rdfs:domain | Museum |
| rdfs:range | owl:Thing |
| rdf:type | |
| rdfs:subPropertyOf | dul:isClassifiedBy |
| owl:equivalentProperty | |
| owl:propertyDisjointWith | |
