OntologyClass talk:Stream: Difference between revisions
From DBpedia Mappings
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'Why is Stream the subclass of river? Following the current labels on this class it looks as people meant "little river". I propose as hierarchy * WaterCourse ** River (natural) ...') |
(misunderstanding) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Johannes|Johannes]] 10:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | [[User:Johannes|Johannes]] 10:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
I agree with Johannes, but there seems to be a misunderstanding here. The german translation (Bach) refers to a creek, a small river, and indeed the English term "stream" may mean that. But what is meant here is a generic water stream, not a creek. My German is not the best, but I think it would be something like Wasserlauf oder Wasserstromm oder Strömmung. WaterCourse if better in English, and that is the meaning of the Portuguese label I just entered (curso d’água) and some others already there. | |||
Revision as of 22:21, 17 December 2015
Why is Stream the subclass of river? Following the current labels on this class it looks as people meant "little river". I propose as hierarchy
- WaterCourse
- River (natural)
- Stream (small)
- Canal (artificial)
- River (natural)
Johannes 10:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Johannes, but there seems to be a misunderstanding here. The german translation (Bach) refers to a creek, a small river, and indeed the English term "stream" may mean that. But what is meant here is a generic water stream, not a creek. My German is not the best, but I think it would be something like Wasserlauf oder Wasserstromm oder Strömmung. WaterCourse if better in English, and that is the meaning of the Portuguese label I just entered (curso d’água) and some others already there.
